This phrase signifies an approach to explaining spyware’s detrimental effects by focusing on what it doesn’t do. Instead of listing every possible consequence, this method highlights the boundaries of spyware’s impact. For instance, while spyware might steal financial data or monitor online activity, it cannot physically damage a device’s hardware like a hammer would. This exclusionary approach helps clarify the scope of spyware’s potential harm and avoids overstating its capabilities.
Using this method offers several advantages. It provides a concise way to manage expectations regarding spyware’s reach. By explicitly stating what spyware cannot do, it clarifies the nature of the threat and prevents misconceptions. This clarity is particularly valuable in educational materials or security awareness campaigns. Historically, defining the boundaries of technical threats has been crucial for effective countermeasures. Understanding limitations informs the development of targeted solutions, focusing resources on areas where intervention is genuinely needed.
