The outcome of the state legislative assembly elections held in Andhra Pradesh in 2014, concurrent with the Indian general election, marked a significant turning point in the state’s political landscape. This election followed the bifurcation of Andhra Pradesh, creating the new state of Telangana. The residuary Andhra Pradesh state, significantly smaller than its predecessor, saw a contest primarily between the Telugu Desam Party (TDP), the YSR Congress Party (YSRCP), and the Indian National Congress (INC), among other parties. The results determined the composition of the 13th Andhra Pradesh Legislative Assembly.
This electoral contest held substantial importance due to the state’s newly reorganized status. The election outcome shaped the initial governance and policy direction of the residuary state, impacting its economic development, social programs, and infrastructure development in the years that followed. The vote reflected public opinion on the bifurcation process and set the stage for the future political trajectory of Andhra Pradesh. The election held historical significance as the first assembly election after the state’s reorganization, offering valuable insights into the evolving political dynamics and voter preferences in the region.
Further analysis can explore specific aspects of the election, such as the performance of individual parties, voter turnout rates in different regions, key campaign issues, and the formation of the subsequent government. A deeper examination of these factors can provide a more nuanced understanding of the 2014 Andhra Pradesh elections impact and legacy.
1. TDP Victory
The Telugu Desam Party’s (TDP) victory in the 2014 Andhra Pradesh Assembly elections stands as a pivotal outcome, intricately linked to the state’s bifurcation and its subsequent political trajectory. This victory signified a major shift in the political landscape, bringing Chandrababu Naidu back to power after a decade and setting the stage for the TDP’s governance of the residuary state.
-
Majority Mandate
The TDP secured a clear majority in the Assembly, winning 102 out of 175 seats. This decisive mandate provided the party with the necessary political stability and authority to implement its agenda without relying heavily on coalition partners. The strong public support indicated a clear preference for the TDP’s vision for the newly formed residuary Andhra Pradesh.
-
Chandrababu Naidu’s Leadership
Naidu’s leadership played a crucial role in the TDP’s victory. His experience as Chief Minister, coupled with his campaign promises focused on development and rebuilding the state post-bifurcation, resonated with voters. His political acumen and perceived ability to navigate the challenges of a newly formed state likely contributed significantly to the party’s success.
-
Bifurcation Impact
The state’s bifurcation served as a significant backdrop to the election. The TDP successfully positioned itself as a party capable of effectively managing the challenges and opportunities arising from the creation of Telangana. This resonated with voters concerned about the economic and administrative implications of the division, contributing to the TDP’s electoral success.
-
Alliance with BJP
The TDP’s pre-poll alliance with the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), which had won the national elections, also contributed to its victory. This alliance allowed the TDP to leverage the BJP’s national appeal and resources, expanding its reach and potentially influencing voter perceptions of its ability to secure benefits for the state from the central government.
The TDP’s 2014 victory shaped the subsequent political landscape of Andhra Pradesh. It marked a new chapter in the state’s history, placing the TDP at the helm of navigating the challenges and opportunities of building a new state from the residuary portion of the former Andhra Pradesh. This electoral outcome laid the groundwork for policy decisions and developmental initiatives that would define the state’s trajectory in the following years.
2. YSRCP Emergence
The 2014 Andhra Pradesh Assembly elections witnessed the significant emergence of the YSR Congress Party (YSRCP) as a major political force. While the party did not secure victory, its performance in the polls underscored its growing influence and solidified its position as a key contender in the state’s political landscape. This emergence was intricately linked to the state’s bifurcation and the evolving political dynamics in the residuary Andhra Pradesh.
-
Strong Opposition
The YSRCP secured 67 out of 175 assembly seats, becoming the principal opposition party in the state. This substantial representation in the Assembly provided a platform to voice alternative perspectives and challenge the ruling TDP’s policies, effectively establishing the YSRCP as a powerful voice in the state’s political discourse. This strong showing laid the groundwork for future electoral contests and positioned the YSRCP as a viable alternative to the TDP.
-
Jagan Mohan Reddy’s Leadership
The leadership of Jagan Mohan Reddy played a crucial role in the YSRCP’s performance. His appeal, particularly among certain segments of the population, translated into significant electoral support. His campaign focused on welfare schemes and addressing the concerns of those perceived to be marginalized resonated with a substantial portion of the electorate, solidifying his position as a prominent political figure.
-
Bifurcation Impact and Public Sentiment
The bifurcation of Andhra Pradesh created a complex political environment, impacting voter preferences and influencing the YSRCP’s emergence. Public sentiment surrounding the bifurcation process likely played a role in the party’s performance, as voters sought political representation that aligned with their views on the division and the future of the residuary state.
-
Vote Share and Regional Influence
The YSRCP secured a considerable share of the popular vote, demonstrating its widespread appeal and regional influence. This strong vote share, even in defeat, underscored the party’s growing support base and its potential to challenge the TDP’s dominance in future elections. The regional variations in the YSRCP’s vote share offered insights into the party’s strongholds and areas where it could focus its efforts in subsequent campaigns.
The YSRCP’s emergence in the 2014 elections significantly altered the political landscape of Andhra Pradesh. The party’s performance established it as a key player in the state’s politics and laid the foundation for its subsequent growth and influence. The results highlighted the evolving political dynamics in the residuary state and the increasing importance of the YSRCP as a significant political force.
3. INC Decline
The 2014 Andhra Pradesh Assembly election results revealed a significant decline in the Indian National Congress’s (INC) political fortunes within the state. This decline represents a key component in understanding the overall election outcome and the shifting political landscape of the newly bifurcated Andhra Pradesh. Several factors contributed to the INC’s diminished performance, ultimately shaping the party’s reduced role in the state’s governance.
The INC’s association with the controversial decision to bifurcate the state played a significant role in its electoral decline. Public sentiment against the bifurcation process, particularly in the residuary Andhra Pradesh, likely translated into a loss of support for the INC. Voters who felt the party had mishandled the division or had not adequately addressed their concerns expressed their dissatisfaction through the ballot box. For example, regions heavily impacted by the division saw a sharper decline in INC support compared to areas less affected. This demonstrates a direct correlation between the bifurcation issue and the party’s electoral performance.
Furthermore, the absence of a strong state-level leadership within the INC further compounded its challenges. The lack of a prominent leader to effectively articulate the party’s vision and connect with voters hampered its ability to mobilize support. This leadership vacuum likely allowed other parties, such as the TDP and YSRCP, to capitalize on public sentiment and gain ground. The INC’s struggle to present a cohesive and compelling narrative further contributed to its decline.
In conclusion, the INC’s decline in the 2014 Andhra Pradesh Assembly elections served as a crucial element in shaping the overall political landscape. The party’s association with the state bifurcation and its lack of robust leadership contributed significantly to its diminished electoral performance. Understanding this decline offers valuable insights into the complex interplay of factors that influenced the election results and the subsequent political dynamics of the residuary state. This decline also presents a significant challenge for the INC in regaining its political foothold within Andhra Pradesh, requiring strategic adjustments and a renewed focus on addressing the concerns of the electorate.
4. Bifurcation Impact
The bifurcation of Andhra Pradesh, resulting in the creation of Telangana, played a pivotal role in shaping the 2014 Andhra Pradesh Assembly election results. This historic event cast a long shadow over the political landscape, significantly influencing voter sentiment, party platforms, and the overall outcome of the elections. Understanding this impact is crucial for comprehending the political dynamics of the residuary Andhra Pradesh.
-
Emotional Resonance and Regional Identity
The bifurcation process evoked strong emotional responses and heightened regional identities, influencing voter preferences. Concerns about the division’s economic and social implications resonated deeply with the electorate. For example, anxieties surrounding the sharing of resources, particularly water and revenue, became key campaign issues. This emotional resonance translated into votes for parties perceived to best represent the interests of the residuary state.
-
Shifting Political Alliances and Party Platforms
The bifurcation necessitated a realignment of political alliances and a redefinition of party platforms. Existing political equations were disrupted, and parties were forced to adapt their strategies to the new realities of a smaller, residuary Andhra Pradesh. The TDP’s alliance with the BJP, for instance, was partly influenced by the bifurcation context. Parties also had to address the specific concerns arising from the division in their campaigns, such as the status of Hyderabad and the allocation of resources.
-
Focus on Development and Reconstruction
The bifurcation placed a significant emphasis on development and reconstruction in the residuary state. The loss of Hyderabad, a major economic hub, created a need for new growth centers and economic strategies. This focus on development became a central theme in the 2014 elections, with parties promising to rebuild the state’s economy and infrastructure. The TDP’s campaign, for example, heavily emphasized development and job creation, reflecting the post-bifurcation priorities.
-
Voter Turnout and Participation
The bifurcation likely influenced voter turnout and participation in the 2014 elections. The significance of the event and the desire to shape the future of the residuary state may have motivated higher voter engagement. Analyzing voter turnout data from different regions, particularly those most affected by the bifurcation, can provide insights into the level of public interest and engagement in the electoral process.
In conclusion, the bifurcation of Andhra Pradesh served as a crucial backdrop for the 2014 Assembly elections. It significantly impacted voter behavior, party strategies, and the overall political landscape. Understanding this impact is essential for analyzing the election results and the subsequent political developments in the residuary state. The bifurcation’s legacy continues to shape the political discourse and policy decisions in Andhra Pradesh, underscoring its enduring relevance.
5. New State Formation
The 2014 Andhra Pradesh Assembly elections were inextricably linked to the formation of the new state of Telangana. This historic event fundamentally reshaped the political landscape and directly influenced the electoral outcomes. Examining the connection between new state formation and the election results provides crucial insights into the political dynamics of the period.
-
Residuary Andhra Pradesh Identity
The creation of Telangana necessitated the formation of a residuary Andhra Pradesh. This new state, smaller in size and grappling with the loss of significant resources, required a distinct political identity. The 2014 elections served as a platform for defining this identity and articulating the aspirations of the residuary state’s population. Political parties campaigned on promises to rebuild the state and address the challenges posed by the bifurcation, appealing to a sense of shared identity and purpose among voters.
-
Resource Allocation and Economic Concerns
The division of assets and resources between Telangana and residuary Andhra Pradesh became a central concern. The allocation of water resources, government institutions, and revenue streams were contentious issues that influenced voter preferences. Parties vying for power had to address these concerns and propose solutions for equitable resource sharing. The election results, in part, reflected public anxieties surrounding these economic and logistical challenges.
-
Political Realignment and New Power Dynamics
The formation of Telangana led to a significant realignment of political forces within the residuary Andhra Pradesh. Existing political equations were disrupted, creating opportunities for new alliances and power dynamics. The 2014 elections provided a testing ground for these new alliances, with parties vying to establish their dominance in the reorganized political landscape. The TDP’s victory, for instance, marked a shift in power dynamics, reflecting the changing political allegiances and voter preferences.
-
Capital City Concerns and Administrative Challenges
The loss of Hyderabad as the state capital presented a significant administrative challenge for residuary Andhra Pradesh. The need to establish a new capital city and reorganize administrative structures became a key electoral issue. Parties proposed different locations and strategies for establishing the new capital, vying to gain public support for their vision. The election outcome, to some extent, reflected public opinion on this critical administrative matter.
The creation of Telangana and the subsequent formation of a residuary Andhra Pradesh fundamentally shaped the 2014 Assembly elections. These intertwined events influenced voter perceptions, campaign strategies, and the ultimate outcome of the polls. Understanding this connection provides crucial context for interpreting the election results and the political developments that followed. The legacy of the bifurcation continues to shape the political discourse and policy decisions in Andhra Pradesh today.
6. Chandrababu Naidu’s Return
Chandrababu Naidu’s return to power in Andhra Pradesh following the 2014 Assembly elections represents a significant element within the larger narrative of the state’s political transformation. His victory, after a decade in opposition, was intricately linked to the specific context of the state’s bifurcation and the subsequent desire for stability and experienced leadership within the residuary Andhra Pradesh. The Telugu Desam Party’s (TDP) success can be significantly attributed to public perception of Naidu’s leadership capabilities, particularly his experience in managing complex economic and administrative challenges.
Naidu’s campaign effectively capitalized on the anxieties and uncertainties surrounding the state’s bifurcation. He presented himself as a seasoned leader capable of navigating the complexities of building a new state from the ground up, emphasizing his track record in developing Hyderabad into a major IT hub. Promises of economic development, job creation, and efficient governance resonated with voters seeking stability and a clear vision for the future. This strategic positioning, combined with the perceived failures of the incumbent Congress party, contributed significantly to the TDP’s electoral triumph and Naidu’s return as Chief Minister. For example, the TDP’s focus on attracting investments and developing new infrastructure projects directly addressed the economic concerns arising from the loss of Hyderabad.
Naidu’s return had profound implications for the political trajectory of Andhra Pradesh. His government embarked on ambitious development projects, seeking to establish new growth centers and diversify the state’s economy. The focus shifted towards building a new capital city, Amaravati, and attracting investments in sectors like information technology, manufacturing, and tourism. While the long-term success of these initiatives remains a subject of ongoing debate, Naidu’s return undeniably marked a turning point in the state’s political and economic landscape. Understanding the connection between his return and the 2014 election results provides crucial insights into the factors that shaped the residuary Andhra Pradesh’s initial years and continue to influence its development trajectory.
7. Residuary Andhra Pradesh
The 2014 Andhra Pradesh Assembly election results cannot be fully understood without considering the context of “Residuary Andhra Pradesh.” This term, denoting the state remaining after the bifurcation that created Telangana, encapsulates the profound impact of the division on the political landscape. The election became a referendum on the future of this newly defined entity, its challenges, and its potential. The very existence of Residuary Andhra Pradesh as a distinct political unit became a central theme, shaping voter priorities and campaign narratives. For instance, the loss of Hyderabad, the established capital and economic powerhouse, became a focal point, with parties proposing competing visions for the new state’s capital and economic development strategy. This focus underscored the unique circumstances of the 2014 elections, distinguishing them from previous contests.
The specific challenges faced by Residuary Andhra Pradesh directly influenced voter behavior. Concerns surrounding resource allocation, particularly water sharing and revenue distribution, became dominant electoral issues. The perceived economic vulnerability of the residuary state, coupled with anxieties about its administrative capacity, shaped voter preferences. Parties that effectively addressed these concerns, such as the Telugu Desam Party with its promises of development and stability, resonated with the electorate. For example, the TDP’s proposal to build a new capital city, Amaravati, aimed to symbolize a fresh start and project confidence in the future of Residuary Andhra Pradesh. The YSR Congress Party’s focus on welfare schemes aimed to address the perceived economic anxieties of the population in the newly formed state. This demonstrates the direct link between the specific challenges of Residuary Andhra Pradesh and the political strategies adopted by contending parties.
Understanding the significance of Residuary Andhra Pradesh is crucial for interpreting the 2014 election results. The outcome represented not merely a change in government, but a mandate for shaping the future of a newly defined political entity. The election results laid the groundwork for policy decisions regarding the state’s capital, its economic development strategy, and its relationship with the central government. Recognizing the unique context of Residuary Andhra Pradesh allows for a more nuanced analysis of the election’s significance, moving beyond simple vote counts to understand the underlying anxieties, aspirations, and political calculations that shaped the outcome. The bifurcation’s legacy continues to influence political discourse and policy priorities in Andhra Pradesh, highlighting the long-term implications of the 2014 election results.
8. Assembly Constituencies
Assembly constituencies form the foundational units of representation in the Andhra Pradesh Legislative Assembly, and understanding their role is crucial for interpreting the 2014 election results. Each constituency elects one representative to the Assembly, and the performance of political parties across these constituencies determines the overall election outcome. The delimitation and distribution of constituencies significantly influenced the electoral map, reflecting demographic shifts and regional variations within the state, particularly following the bifurcation.
-
Constituency Demographics and Voter Behavior
The demographic composition of each constituency played a significant role in shaping voter behavior and influencing the results. Factors such as caste, religion, economic status, and access to education varied across constituencies, impacting the appeal of different political parties and their candidates. For example, constituencies with a significant rural population might have prioritized agricultural issues, while urban constituencies may have focused on infrastructure development and employment opportunities. Analyzing the demographic profile of each constituency provides insights into the factors driving voter choices.
-
Regional Variations and Party Strongholds
The 2014 election results revealed distinct regional variations in voter preferences, highlighting the existence of party strongholds and areas of intense competition. Certain parties performed exceptionally well in specific regions, reflecting local political dynamics and historical voting patterns. For example, the TDP performed strongly in coastal Andhra districts, while the YSRCP held sway in Rayalaseema. Mapping these regional variations provides a granular understanding of the electoral landscape and the distribution of political power.
-
Candidate Selection and Campaign Strategies
Political parties tailored their candidate selection and campaign strategies to the specific characteristics of each constituency. Local factors, such as caste equations and dominant local issues, played a crucial role in determining candidate selection. Campaign messages were often customized to resonate with the specific concerns and aspirations of voters within each constituency. Analyzing candidate profiles and campaign strategies offers insights into the micro-level political dynamics at play.
-
Impact of Bifurcation on Constituency Boundaries
The bifurcation of Andhra Pradesh had a significant impact on constituency boundaries. The redrawing of electoral maps following the creation of Telangana necessitated adjustments to existing constituencies and the creation of new ones. This process influenced the demographic composition and political dynamics within each constituency, impacting the 2014 election results. Understanding the changes in constituency boundaries is crucial for analyzing the shift in voting patterns and the realignment of political forces.
In conclusion, analyzing the 2014 Andhra Pradesh election results through the lens of assembly constituencies provides a nuanced understanding of the complex factors that shaped the outcome. By examining demographic variations, regional voting patterns, candidate selection strategies, and the impact of bifurcation on constituency boundaries, we can gain valuable insights into the evolving political landscape of the state. This granular perspective allows for a deeper appreciation of the interplay between local dynamics and broader state-level political trends, ultimately contributing to a more comprehensive understanding of the election’s significance.
9. Popular Mandate
The 2014 Andhra Pradesh election results undeniably represent a popular mandate, conferring legitimacy and authority upon the newly elected government. The Telugu Desam Party (TDP), securing a clear majority in the Legislative Assembly, received a demonstrable endorsement of its platform and leadership from the electorate. This mandate stemmed from a confluence of factors, including the TDP’s strategic alliances, its focus on development in the newly bifurcated state, and the public perception of its leader, Chandrababu Naidu, as a capable administrator. This clear mandate provided the TDP with the political capital to implement its agenda, shaping the initial trajectory of the residuary state. The popular mandate also signified a rejection of the incumbent Indian National Congress, holding it accountable for the perceived missteps in the bifurcation process and its subsequent handling of the challenges faced by the residuary state. For instance, the TDP’s significant victory margin in several constituencies traditionally considered Congress strongholds illustrates the extent of public dissatisfaction with the incumbent party.
Analyzing the popular mandate requires examination of specific voting patterns across different demographics and regions. While the TDP secured a statewide majority, regional variations in voting preferences offer further insights into the nuances of public opinion. For example, the strong performance of the YSR Congress Party in certain districts, even in defeat, highlights the persistence of localized political dynamics and the diverse range of factors influencing voter choices. Examining these variations provides a more granular understanding of the popular mandate, moving beyond simple majority calculations to uncover the complex interplay of regional identities, caste affiliations, and specific local issues that shaped the overall outcome. Furthermore, analyzing voter turnout rates across different demographics provides insights into the levels of political engagement among various segments of the population, contributing to a more nuanced understanding of the mandate’s breadth and depth.
Understanding the popular mandate’s significance is crucial for assessing the legitimacy and effectiveness of the subsequent government’s actions. The mandate provides a framework for evaluating the government’s performance against its pre-election promises and the public’s expectations. It also serves as a benchmark for assessing the government’s responsiveness to public concerns and its ability to address the challenges faced by the state. However, interpreting the popular mandate is not without its challenges. The complexity of voter motivations and the influence of various socio-political factors make it difficult to definitively ascribe specific meanings to the election outcome. Nevertheless, analyzing the mandate through various lenses, such as regional voting patterns and demographic variations, provides valuable insights into the dynamics of public opinion and the underlying political currents shaping the state’s trajectory. This understanding is essential for both policymakers and citizens seeking to navigate the complexities of governance and democratic representation in the post-bifurcation era.
Frequently Asked Questions
This FAQ section addresses common queries regarding the Andhra Pradesh Assembly elections held in 2014, providing concise and informative responses.
Question 1: Why were the 2014 Andhra Pradesh Assembly elections significant?
The 2014 elections were the first held after the bifurcation of Andhra Pradesh, creating the new state of Telangana. This historic event significantly impacted the political landscape, voter sentiment, and the overall election results, making them particularly significant.
Question 2: Which party won the 2014 Andhra Pradesh Assembly elections?
The Telugu Desam Party (TDP), led by N. Chandrababu Naidu, secured a majority in the Assembly, winning 102 out of 175 seats.
Question 3: What was the impact of the state bifurcation on the election results?
The bifurcation significantly impacted the election, influencing voter preferences and campaign narratives. Concerns about resource allocation, the new capital city’s location, and the overall future of the residuary state became central election issues.
Question 4: How did the Indian National Congress perform in the 2014 elections?
The Indian National Congress (INC) experienced a significant decline in its performance, attributed in part to public dissatisfaction with its handling of the bifurcation process. The party won a substantially reduced number of seats compared to previous elections.
Question 5: What role did N. Chandrababu Naidu play in the 2014 elections?
N. Chandrababu Naidu, as the leader of the TDP, played a crucial role. His campaign focused on development, rebuilding the state post-bifurcation, and leveraging his experience as a former Chief Minister. His leadership was a significant factor in the TDP’s victory.
Question 6: Where can one find detailed results of the 2014 Andhra Pradesh Assembly elections?
Detailed election results, including constituency-wise data and vote share percentages, can be found on the Election Commission of India’s website and reputable news archives.
Understanding the context and outcomes of the 2014 Andhra Pradesh Assembly elections is crucial for comprehending the state’s current political landscape and future trajectory.
Further analysis of specific aspects of the election, such as individual candidate performance and regional variations in voting patterns, can provide a more nuanced understanding of this pivotal moment in Andhra Pradesh’s political history.
Understanding Andhra Pradesh 2014 Election Outcomes
Analyzing election results requires a multifaceted approach. The following insights provide a framework for understanding the outcomes of the 2014 Andhra Pradesh Assembly elections.
Tip 1: Consider the Bifurcation Context:
The creation of Telangana fundamentally reshaped the political landscape. Analyze results considering the impact of the bifurcation on voter sentiment, resource allocation concerns, and the new state’s political identity.
Tip 2: Analyze Regional Variations:
Voting patterns differed significantly across regions. Explore regional variations in party performance to understand local political dynamics and identify party strongholds.
Tip 3: Examine Leadership Dynamics:
Leadership played a crucial role. Analyze the influence of key political figures, such as Chandrababu Naidu and Jagan Mohan Reddy, on voter preferences and party strategies.
Tip 4: Assess Party Platforms and Campaign Strategies:
Examine how party platforms addressed key issues like development, resource allocation, and the new capital city. Analyze campaign strategies and their effectiveness in mobilizing voter support.
Tip 5: Study Voter Turnout and Demographics:
Voter turnout rates and demographic variations offer insights into political engagement and the factors influencing voter choices. Analyze these factors to understand the mandate’s breadth and depth.
Tip 6: Consult Reputable Sources:
Refer to official election data from the Election Commission of India and credible news archives for accurate and detailed information. Avoid misinformation and unsubstantiated claims.
Tip 7: Consider Long-Term Implications:
The 2014 election results had lasting consequences for Andhra Pradesh’s political trajectory. Consider the long-term impacts on policy decisions, development initiatives, and the state’s overall political landscape.
By applying these insights, one can gain a deeper understanding of the complexities and significance of the 2014 Andhra Pradesh Assembly elections.
The analysis of these key areas provides a foundation for further exploration and a more comprehensive understanding of this pivotal election and its lasting impact on Andhra Pradesh.
Conclusion
The Andhra Pradesh election results of 2014 represent a watershed moment in the state’s political history. The bifurcation’s impact resonated deeply, influencing voter preferences and campaign narratives. The Telugu Desam Party’s victory, led by Chandrababu Naidu, signified a desire for stability and development in the newly formed residuary state. The election outcome also highlighted the decline of the Indian National Congress and the emergence of the YSR Congress Party as a significant political force. Analysis of regional variations in voting patterns, the performance of individual constituencies, and the popular mandate offers crucial insights into the complex political dynamics of the period. The election effectively set the stage for the subsequent political trajectory and policy decisions of the residuary Andhra Pradesh.
The legacy of the 2014 election continues to shape Andhra Pradesh’s political landscape. Further research and analysis of these results remain crucial for understanding the long-term implications of the bifurcation and its impact on the state’s development trajectory. Continued examination of voter behavior, party strategies, and policy outcomes will contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of this pivotal moment in Andhra Pradesh’s history and its implications for the future.
